You are here:  Ed9 07.2015 Guidebook  » Hot Topics

35 U.S.C. 101:

MPEP 2100

Inventions will be granted for “any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof”.

Rejections based on a lack of utility (35 U.S.C. 101) may include:

  • Any substantially unaltered thing occurring in nature, for example:
    • A shrimp with its head and digestive tract removed is not patentable.
  • Printed matter.
  • A scientific principle, divorced from any tangible structure.
  • Mathematical discoveries are not patentable.
    • However, the methods of using such principles and devices embodying the principles may be patentable.

In order to establish prima facie, it is not necessary that there be a suggestion or an expectation from the prior art that the claimed invention will have the same or a similar utility as one which is newly discovered by the applicant.