New Trial Proceedings Introduction


The United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office or USPTO) is revising the rules of practice to implement the provisions of the Leahy- Smith America Invents Act (ββAIAββ) that create the new inter partes review proceeding, post-grant review proceeding, and transitional post-grant review proceeding for covered business method patents, to be conducted before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board).


These provisions of the AIA will take effect on September 16, 2012, one year after the date of enactment.
Applicability Dates:
The changes for inter partes review proceedings apply to any patent issued before, on, or after September 16, 2012.
The changes for post-grant review proceedings generally apply to patents issuing from applications subject to first-inventor-to-file provisions of the AIA.
- In addition, the Chief Administrative Patent Judge may, in the interests-of-justice, order an interferences commenced before September 16, 2012, to be dismissed without prejudice to the filing of a petition for post-grant review.
The changes for transitional program for covered business method patents apply to any covered business method patent issued before, on, or after September 16, 2012.


Executive Summary:
The patent trial regulations lay out a framework for conducting the proceedings aimed at streamlining and converging the issues for decision.
Summary of Major Provisions:
The following points are covered for inter partes review:
- (1) The requirements for a petition to institute an inter partes review of a patent;
- (2) the standards for showing of sufficient grounds to institute an inter partes review;
- (3) the standards for instituting an inter partes review;
- (4) the procedures for conducting an inter partes review that permits a patent owner response, a submission of written comments, and an oral hearing;
- (5) the standards and procedures for discovery and for the patent owner to move to amend the patent; and
- (6) the time periods for completing the review (subpart B of 37 CFR part 42).
The following points are covered for post-grant review:
- (1) The requirements for a petition to institute a post-grant review of a patent;
- (2) the standards for showing of sufficient grounds to institute a post-grant review;
- (3) the standards for instituting a post-grant review;
- (4) the procedures for conducting a post-grant review that permits a patent owner response, a submission of written comments, and an oral hearing;
- (5) the standards and procedures for discovery and for the patent owner to move to amend the patent; and
- (6) the time periods for completing the review (subpart C of 37 CFR part 42).
The following points are covered for transitional post-grant review of covered business method patents:
- (1) The requirements for a petition to institute a post-grant review of a covered business method patent;
- (2) the standards for showing of sufficient grounds to institute a post-grant review of a covered business method patent;
- (3) the standards for instituting a post-grant review of a covered business method patent;
- (4) the procedures for conducting a post-grant review that permits a patent owner response, a submission of written comments, and an oral hearing;
- (5) the standards and procedures for discovery and for the patent owner to move to amend the patent; and
- (6) the time periods for completing the review (subpart D of 37 CFR part 42).